Recently, the team and I wrapped up a month-long project: our audiophile headphone ranking list, which you can find here.

As I was putting my ranking lists together, I kept drifting. I was, not perniciously of course, slaying a good few sacred cows with my ratings. Knowing how people would be responding to me being honest about things I feel are overrated made me think of the opposite: Are there any headphones I really like that I feel aren't given enough praise, even by people who I know would listen/hear differently than I do?

Which led to an even more pointed thought:

What is the most underrated audiophile headphone? 

I actually think there is a real answer to that question. So I want to explain the criteria I use to answer this question of whether a headphone is underrated—and then make the case for the one model that, in my view, fits that description better than anything else on the market.

What Does “Underrated” Even Mean?

For a headphone to be underrated, a few things have to be true.

First, I obviously have to think the headphone is good. “Underrated” implies that there’s real merit there—something worth appreciating—that simply isn’t being recognized by the broader discourse.

Second, it has to be under-appreciated relative to how good it is. A headphone like the Sennheiser HD 6XX can’t really be underrated. It’s ubiquitous, widely praised, and constantly discussed. If everyone already agrees something is great, it’s not exactly flying under the radar, is it?

Third, there's often something about the headphone that puts people off before they even hear it. In today’s headphone space, a lot of judgments are made sight-unseen—and ear-unheard(?) That can be because of how a headphone looks, how much it costs, or, most commonly, how it measures. People compare a graph to a target curve they think they understand fully, see something they don’t like, and mentally check out long before listening.

Finally, I think underrated headphones often shine in areas that aren’t strictly about sound. Comfort, build quality, weight, ergonomics, and overall usability matter enormously in real life, but they’re often treated as secondary concerns in our space. A headphone that does those things exceptionally well—but only sounds “very good” instead of “best in class”—is a prime candidate for being overlooked.

The Most Underrated Audiophile Headphone

With all of that in mind, the headphone that checks all of the above boxes and truly earns the title of Most Underrated Audiophile Headphone is... the Sony MDR-MV1.

If you’ve seen much of my content or talked to me on Discord, this probably won’t surprise you. It might be the single headphone I don’t own, that I most wish I did.

Let’s talk about why, and go through the aforementioned rubric to see how it checks all of these boxes.

Comfort, Build, and Design: Quietly Excellent

This is where most people who have tried the MV1 already give it credit—and rightly so.

Visually, I just... love it. Sony’s studio headphone design language really works for me, especially the headband, where MV1 clearly nods to classics like the MDR-7506 but improves on them in meaningful ways. The padding is better, the adjustment mechanism is more satisfying, and the numbered click system is perfect if you’re obsessive about symmetry like I am.

The ear pads are soft ear-shaped microsuede. For most people, they’re likely to be extremely comfortable unless you have truly massive ears. My main complaints are minor: I’d personally prefer a suspension strap for my slightly lumpy head, and I wish the pads were just a bit deeper, since they do compress over time and my right ear can brush the baffle after about an hour.

Even with those minor complaints, this is one of the most comfortable headphones I’ve worn, but I've not even touched on the best part: They're shockingly light. At roughly 220–230 grams, it feels incredibly featherweight, to the point where the weight will almost certainly cause some people to assume it must be cheaply built. It isn’t. There’s metal where it matters, and the overall construction inspires a lot of confidence.

Price and Expectations

At around $400, the MDR-MV1 isn’t cheap, but it’s also not out of reach. For many “normal” people, it’s about as much as they’d ever consider spending on a headphone—especially when compared to things like AirPods Max. For audiophiles, it’s relatively modest.

However, in the audiophile sphere where people don't often treat $400 as "expensive," that price point sets expectations lower than it probably should. Combined with its understated looks, the MV1 doesn’t scream “giant killer,” which I think contributes heavily to it being overlooked by audiophiles

The Measurement Problem

Then there’s the big one: measurements.

If you’ve seen graphs of the MDR-MV1 on industry-standard test fixtures, you’ve probably noticed a massive peak in the lower mid-treble—somewhere around 6 to 8 kHz. A lot of people see that and immediately write the headphone off as unbearably bright.

Here’s the thing: I don’t hear that peak the way the measurements suggest.

There’s solid evidence from researchers like Sean Olive and Fabian Brinkmann that headphone measurement rigs tend to overestimate energy in exactly this region. Human ear responses often dip in the 6–9 kHz band, while test fixtures don’t. On my head, I hear maybe a narrow emphasis around 6 kHz, but I don’t hear the broad 7–9 kHz elevation at all.

In fact, the MV1 is one of the only over-ear dynamic headphones I’ve used that doesn’t have a big 7–8 kHz dip for me. That’s a huge part of why it sounds the way it does—and why judging it purely by graphs is such a mistake.

Nobody Talks About It

Despite all of this, the MDR-MV1 barely shows up in recommendation lists or roundups. I see it mentioned occasionally on Discord, usually by the same few people, but that’s about it.

That’s baffling to me, because even if we talk strictly about sound quality, there are things this headphone does that very few others do—especially at this price.

How Does It Actually Sound?

This isn’t a headphone for everyone, but honestly I think it has a way bigger audience in theory than it's actually found on its own.

The midrange is the foundation. It’s natural, slightly warm, and relaxed without losing texture. There’s a bit of bass bleed into the lower mids, which can make male vocals sound fuller and more chesty, but I think many people who love the HD 600 or 650 midrange might actually prefer this presentation.

The bass is the real headline. It’s exceptionally well extended—planar-level extension in an open-back dynamic headphone—with a substantial rise in level. It’s Harman-level bass, but not a "tucked" Harman shelf, which means it integrates more smoothly with the mids and avoids that hollowed-out 200 Hz region that often makes bass sound disconnected.

Because the 1–3 kHz region stays sensible and “normal,” you get excellent texturing and harmonic detail in bass instruments. Compared to headphones like the HD 490 Pro or Meze 105 Air, the MV1 finds a much better balance between weight, clarity, and coherence.

The result is a rare, sensible V-shaped tuning that truly bridges audiophile and consumer sensibilities. It has big bass, high energy, but it doesn’t abandon midrange integrity or treble structure. It’s the only V-shaped headphone that I really enjoy as someone who normally prefers neutral tuning.

Why It Matters

This headphone challenged my own assumptions—about my preferences, and about how much trust we should put in measurements alone. It’s not perfect. The bass can be a bit poofy, and the treble can be a little glassy or sharp on certain material.

But this headphone offers something genuinely different, from a massive brand, at a reasonable price, with exceptional comfort and build. Yet somehow, almost no one talks about it.

For me, that makes the Sony MDR-MV1 the most underrated audiophile headphone out there.

Scores

Sound: 6.1/10

Overall: 6.6/10